Warning: mkdir() [
function.mkdir]: Permission denied in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
12
Warning: mkdir() [
function.mkdir]: No such file or directory in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
12
Warning: fopen(/home/templatecore2cache//*cluesnet.com/ce/ce6c506285ae80636903d0dc450e09bf62c6d6b4.tc2cache) [
function.fopen]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
130
Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
131
Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in
/home/webs/affiliatelib2/CacheManager.php on line
132
In government,
bicameralism (bi + Latin , chamber) is the practice of having two legislative or
parliamentary chambers. Thus, a
bicameral parliament or
bicameral legislature is a legislature which consists of two chambers or houses. Bicameralism is an essential and defining feature of the
classical antiquity notion of mixed government. Bicameral legislatures tend to require a
concurrent majority to pass legislation.
Theory
Although the ideas on which bicameralism is based can be traced back to the theories developed in Ancient Sumer and later ancient Greece,
History of India, and Ancient Rome, recognizable bicameral institutions first arose in medieval Europe where they were associated with separate representation of different estates of the realm.
The Founding Fathers of the United States eschewed any notion of separate representation for aristocracy, but they accepted the prevailing disposition towards bicameralism. However, as part of the
Great Compromise between large states and small states, they invented a new rationale for bicameralism in which the upper house would have states represented equally and the lower house would have them represented by population.
with two wings. The north wing houses the United States Senate while the south wing houses the
United States House of Representatives.
In subsequent constitution making, federal states have often adopted bicameralism, and the solution remains popular when regional differences or sensitivities require more explicit representation, with the second chamber representing the constituent states. Nevertheless, the older justification for second chambers — providing opportunities for second thoughts about legislation — has survived. A trend towards
unicameralism in the 20th century appears now to have been halted.
Growing awareness of the complexity of the notion of representation and the multifunctional nature of modern legislatures may be affording incipient new rationales for second chambers, though these do generally remain contested institutions in ways that first chambers are not. An example of political controversy regardinga second chamber has been the debate over the powers of the
Canadian Senate.
The relationship between the two chambers varies; in some cases, they have equal power, while in others, one chamber is clearly superior in its powers. The first tends to be the case in federal systems and those with presidential governments. The latter tends to be the case in unitary states with parliamentary systems.
Some political scientists believe that bicameralism makes meaningful political reforms more difficult to achieve and increases the risk of deadlock (particularly in cases where both chambers have similar powers). Others argue strongly for the merits of the '
checks and balances' provided by the bicameral model, which they believe helps prevent the passage into law of ill-considered legislation.
Types
Federalism
Some countries, such as
Argentina,
Australia,
Belgium,
Brazil, Canada, Germany,
India, Malaysia,
Mexico, Pakistan, Russia,
South Africa,
Switzerland, and the
United States link their bicameral systems to their federation political structure.
In the United States, Australia, Mexico and Brazil, for example, each state is given the same number of seats in the legislature's upper house. This takes no account of population differences between states — it is designed to ensure that smaller states are not overshadowed by more populous ones. (In the United States, the deal that ensured this arrangement is known as the
Connecticut Compromise.) In the lower houses of each country, these provisions do not apply, and seats are allocated based purely on population. The bicameral system, therefore, is a method of combining the principle of democratic equality with the principle of federalism — all citizens are equal in the lower houses, while all states are equal in the upper houses.
In Canada, the country as a whole is divided into a number of Canadian Senate Divisions, each with a different number of Senators, based on a number of factors. These Divisions are Quebec, Ontario, Western Canada, and
the Maritimes, each with 24 Senators, Yukon,
Northwest Territories,
Nunavut, each with 1 Senator, and
Newfoundland and Labrador has 6 Senators, making for a total of 105 Senators.
In the German, Indian, and Pakistani systems, the upper houses (the Bundesrat (Germany), the Rajya Sabha, and the
Senate of Pakistan respectively) are even more closely linked with the federal system, being appointed or elected directly by the governments of each States of Germany,
States and territories of India, or
Provinces of Pakistan. (This was also the case in the United States before the Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.)
There are also instances of bicameralism in countries that are not federations, but which have upper houses with representation on a territorial basis. For example in
South Africa, the
National Council of Provinces (and before 1997, the
Senate of South Africa) has its members chosen by each
Provinces of South Africa's legislature.
In Spain the Spanish Senate functions as a
de facto territorial-based upper house, and there has been some pressure from the Autonomous Communities to reform it into a strictly territorial chamber.
Aristocratic
In a few countries, bicameralism involves the juxtaposition of democratic and aristocratic elements.
The best known example is the
United Kingdom House of Lords, which includes a number of
hereditary peers. The House of Lords represents a vestige of the aristocratic system which once predominated in British politics, while the other house, the British House of Commons, is entirely elected. Over the years, there have been proposals to reform the House of Lords, some of which have been at least partly successful — the House of Lords Act 1999 limited the number of hereditary peers (as opposed to life peers, appointed by the government) to 92, down from around 700. The ability of the House of Lords to block legislation is curtailed by the Parliament Act. Further reform of the Lords is planned; said reform would almost certainly include the removal of the remaining hereditary peers.
Another example of aristocratic bicameralism was the
Japan House of Peers, abolished after World War II and replaced with the present House of Councillors.
Unitary states
Many bicameral systems are not connected with either federalism or an aristocracy, however.
Japan, France,
Italy, the Netherlands, the
Philippines, the Czech Republic, the
Republic of Ireland and Romania are examples of bicameral systems existing in
unitary states. In countries such as these, the upper house generally exists solely for the purpose of scrutinising and possibly vetoing the decisions of the lower house.
In some of these countries, the upper house is indirectly elected. Members of France's French Senate, Ireland's Seanad Éireann are chosen by
electoral colleges consisting of members of the lower house, local councillors, the Taoiseach, and graduates of selected universities, while the Netherlands'
Eerste Kamer is chosen by members of provincial assemblies.
Subnational entities
In some countries with federal systems, individual states (like those of the United States and States and territories of Australia) may also have bicameral legislatures. Only two such states,
Nebraska in the US and
Queensland in Australia, have adopted unicameral systems.
However, in early United States of America history, unicameral
State legislature (United States) were not totally uncommon: even though twelve of the original thirteen States (
Pennsylvania being the only exception) had a bicameral legislature at the time of the
Philadelphia Convention, some of the new States didn't immediately adopt such system. It was not until
1836, for example, that
Vermont finally created a Senate.
During the
1930s, the Legislature of the State of Nebraska was reduced from
bicameral to unicameral with the 43 members that once comprised that state's Senate. One of the arguments used to sell the idea at the time to Nebraska voters was that by adopting a unicameral system, the perceived evils of the "conference committee" process would be eliminated.
A conference committee is appointed when the two chambers cannot agree on the same wording of a proposal, and consists of a small number of legislators from each chamber. This tends to place much power in the hands of only a small number of legislators. Whatever legislation, if any, the conference committee finalizes must then be approved in an unamendable "take-it-or-leave-it" manner by both chambers.
During his term as
Governor of the State of Minnesota,
Jesse Ventura proposed converting the Minnesotan legislature to a single chamber with
proportional representation, as a reform that he felt would solve many legislative difficulties and impinge upon legislative corruption. In his book on political issues,
Do I Stand Alone?, Ventura argued that bicameral legislatures for provincial and local areas were excessive and unnecessary, and discussed unicameralism as a reform that could address many legislative and budgetary problems for states.
In Australian states the lower house was traditionally elected based on the one-vote-one-value principle, whereas the upper house was partially appointed and elected, with a bias towards country voters. In Queensland, the appointed
Queensland Legislative Council was abolished in
1922, while New South Wales there were similar attempts at abolition, before the New South Wales Legislative Council was reformed in the
1970s to provide for direct election. Nowadays, the upper house is elected using proportional voting and the lower house through preferential voting, except in Tasmania, where proportional voting is used for the lower house, and preferential voting for the upper house.
Arab political reform
A 2005 report on democratic reform in the Arab world by the US
Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsored by former Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright urged Arab states to adopt bicameralism, with upper chambers appointed on a 'specialised basis'. The Council claimed that this would protect against the 'tyranny of the majority', expressing concerns that without a system of checks and balances extremists would use the single chamber parliaments to restrict the rights of minority groups.
In 2002,
Bahrain adopted a bicameral system with an elected lower chamber and an appointed upper house. This led to a boycott of parliamentary elections that year by the
Al Wefaq party, who said that the government would use the upper house to veto their plans. Many secular critics of bicameralism were won round to its benefits in 2005, after many MPs in the lower house voted for the introduction of so-called 'morality police'.
Examples
Bicameralism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In government, bicameralism (bi + Latin camera, chamber) is the practice of having two legislative or parliamentary chambers. Thus, a bicameral parliament or bicameral legislature ...
bicameral definition |Dictionary.com
adjective Government. having two branches, chambers, or houses, as a legislative body.
bicameral - definition of bicameral in the Medical dictionary - by the ...
bicameral /bi·cam·er·al/ (bi-kam´er-al) having two chambers or cavities. bi·cam·er·al (b-k m r-l) adj. Composed of or having two chambers, especially an abscess divided by a ...
Definition: bicameral from Online Medical Dictionary
The Online Medical Dictionary is a searchable dictionary of definitions from medicine, science and technology.
Amazon.co.uk: The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the ...
Amazon.co.uk: The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind: Julian Jaynes: Books
Bicameralism (psychology) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In psychology, bicameralism is a controversial hypothesis which argues that the human brain once assumed a state known as a bicameral mind in which cognitive functions are divided ...
Bicameral Mind Thesis
A comment on The Origin Of Consciousness. As I understand it, Jaynes proposes that some climatic catastrophe around 1000 BC required the left and right halves of the brain to ...
Amazon.co.uk: Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the ...
Amazon.co.uk: Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind: Julian Jaynes: Books
bicameral system definition of bicameral system in the Free Online ...
bicameral system (bīkăm`ərəl), governmental system dividing the legislative function between two chambers, an "upper," such as the U.S. Senate and the British House of Lords ...
Flickr: bicameral's Photostream
bicameral's photostream Sets Tags Map Archives Favorites Profile. Slideshow. Guest Passes let you share your photos that aren't public. Anyone can see your public photos anytime ...